Most A/B tests fail before they even start. Not because the hypothesis is wrong or the creative is poor, but because the test was never designed to succeed in the first place.
Here’s what typically happens: A marketing team gets excited about testing a new landing page variant. They plug some numbers into a standard A/B testing calculator, see they need 5,000 visitors per variant, and think “Great, we get about 10,000 visitors per month, so we’ll run this for a month.”
Four weeks later, the results come back inconclusive. The team shrugs, calls it a learning experience, and moves on to the next test. Sound familiar?
The problem isn’t the testing process itself—it’s the planning. Traditional A/B testing calculators ask you to guess the effect size you want to detect before telling you if your traffic can actually support finding it. It’s backwards thinking that leads to poorly designed experiments.
Why Traditional A/B Testing Planning Falls Short
Standard A/B testing calculators follow a simple formula: input your expected effect size, desired statistical power, and significance level, and they’ll spit out a sample size requirement. But this approach has three major flaws:
Table of contents
Open Table of contents
Enter the Reverse MDE Calculator
A reverse Minimum Detectable Effect (MDE) calculator flips the traditional approach on its head. Instead of guessing what effect you want to find, you input what you actually have—your traffic, your timeline, your constraints—and it tells you the smallest effect you can reliably detect.
This approach is far more practical because it grounds your testing strategy in reality rather than wishful thinking.
How It Works
Instead of asking “How many visitors do I need to detect a 10% improvement?”, a reverse MDE calculator answers “With 1,000 visitors per week and a 4-week testing window, what’s the smallest improvement I can reliably detect?”
The inputs are straightforward:
-
Your weekly traffic volume
-
Current conversion rate
-
How long you can run the test
-
Desired statistical power (typically 80%)
-
Significance level (typically 5%)
The output tells you exactly what size effect you can detect with confidence, plus whether that effect size is worth pursuing from a business perspective.
Why This Changes Everything
When you know your minimum detectable effect upfront, you can make informed decisions about whether a test is worth running at all.
Example: E-commerce Checkout Test
Let’s say you’re planning to test a simplified checkout flow. Your current setup:
-
2,000 weekly visitors to checkout
-
Current conversion rate: 3%
-
Available testing window: 3 weeks
A reverse MDE calculator tells you that with these constraints, you can detect a minimum effect of 35% improvement (from 3% to 4.05% conversion rate).
Now you can ask the right question: “Is it realistic that simplifying our checkout could improve conversions by 35% or more?” If yes, run the test. If not, either find more traffic, extend the timeline, or focus on bigger changes that could realistically hit that threshold.
Example: Email Subject Line Test
Your email list has 50,000 subscribers with a 25% open rate. You want to test new subject lines but can only run the test for one send (no time for multiple campaigns).
The reverse MDE calculator shows you can detect about a 8% relative improvement in open rates. Since subject line changes often produce effects in the 5-15% range, this test makes sense to run.
Practical Benefits for Marketing Teams
Better Resource Allocation
When you know upfront that you can only detect large effects, you’ll focus your creative energy on big, bold changes rather than minor tweaks. This leads to more impactful tests and better use of development resources.
Realistic Timeline Planning
No more surprise extensions or inconclusive results. You’ll know exactly how long tests need to run and can plan your campaign calendar accordingly.
Stakeholder Management
It’s much easier to manage expectations when you can say “Based on our traffic, we can detect improvements of 20% or larger” rather than running tests that were never designed to produce conclusive results.
Higher Success Rate
Tests planned with proper MDE calculations are far more likely to reach statistical significance and provide actionable insights.
When Not to Run a Test
Sometimes the most valuable outcome of using a reverse MDE calculator is deciding not to run a test at all.
If your calculator shows you can only detect a 50% improvement, but you’re testing a minor button colour change, you’re probably wasting your time. Better to:
-
Wait until you have more traffic
-
Test bigger changes that could realistically produce larger effects
-
Focus on other marketing activities with clearer ROI
This isn’t a failure—it’s smart resource allocation.
Implementation Tips
Start with Your Constraints
Before planning any test, document your realistic constraints:
-
How much traffic do you actually get to the page being tested?
-
How long can you realistically run the test?
-
Are there seasonal factors or campaign end dates to consider?
Use Conservative Traffic Estimates
Don’t use your peak traffic numbers. Use typical or slightly below-average figures to account for natural fluctuations.
Consider Business Impact
Just because you can detect an effect doesn’t mean it’s worth the effort. A 15% improvement in conversion rate sounds great, but if that’s only 2 extra conversions per month, the business impact might not justify the development time.
Plan Multiple Tests
Use the calculator to plan your entire testing roadmap. You might discover that combining two smaller tests into one larger experiment gives you better statistical power.
Tools and Resources
While you can build your own reverse MDE calculator, there are excellent tools already available. The reverse MDE calculator developed by Haley Carpenter and Ishan Goel is particularly well-designed and freely available.
The tool handles the statistical complexity while keeping the interface simple enough for daily use by marketing teams.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Ignoring Baseline Conversion Rates
A 20% relative improvement means very different things if your baseline is 1% versus 20%. Make sure you’re using accurate baseline metrics.
Forgetting About Practical Significance
Statistical significance isn’t the same as business significance. A statistically significant 2% improvement might not be worth implementing if it requires major development work.
Not Accounting for Traffic Quality
If you’re driving extra traffic to meet sample size requirements, make sure it’s similar quality to your normal traffic. Paid social visitors might behave very differently from organic search visitors.
The Bottom Line
A reverse MDE calculator isn’t just another tool—it’s a fundamentally better approach to A/B testing that starts with reality instead of assumptions.
By understanding what effects you can actually detect with your available traffic and timeline, you’ll run fewer tests but get more actionable results. You’ll stop wasting time on underpowered experiments and start focusing on changes that can produce measurable business impact.
The best marketing teams aren’t the ones running the most tests—they’re the ones running the right tests. A reverse MDE calculator helps ensure every test you run is designed for success from day one.
Growth Method is the only AI-native project management tool built specifically for marketing and growth teams. Our platform helps you plan, execute, and measure experiments more effectively. Book a call to speak with Stuart, our founder, and discover how we can streamline your growth operations.