Skip to content
Go back

How to build a culture of experimentation in your marketing team

Stuart Brameld

Stuart Brameld

Founder
Updated:
Table of contents

Most marketing teams say they value experimentation. Few actually practise it. The gap between intention and reality usually comes down to culture: the unwritten rules, incentives, and behaviours that determine whether your team runs fast, fearless experiments or defaults to safe, predictable work.

Building a culture of experimentation is not about buying a testing tool or running a few A/B tests. It is about creating an environment where testing ideas is the default way of working, where failure is treated as learning, and where data consistently beats opinion.

What is a culture of experimentation?

In a culture of experimentation, the team tests ideas before committing resources, measures results rigorously, and uses those learnings to inform future decisions. It is the opposite of the HiPPO effect, where the Highest Paid Person’s Opinion determines what gets done.

Alex Birkett, previously Growth Marketing Manager at HubSpot and co-founder of Omniscient Digital, defines a culture of experimentation as:

A belief that there aren’t any sacred cows in terms of the way things are done or designed. An opinion, no matter how highly paid, is still an opinion – instead, an organisation makes data-informed decisions.

In a culture of experimentation, failure isn’t punished, insights and learning are rewarded, and team members are encouraged to innovate and discover new ways of growth.

In an experimentation culture:

Research from Stefan Thomke, professor at Harvard Business School, found that the biggest barrier to scaling experimentation is not technology, it is culture. In his study of Booking.com, Microsoft, and Amazon, the organisations that experimented most successfully had made experimentation a core part of how they operated.

To build a culture of experimentation, you need an environment where curiosity is nurtured, data trumps opinion, anyone can run a test, and managers embrace a new model of leadership.

Stefan Thomke, Harvard Business School

Experimentation culture vs performance culture

Most marketing organisations run on a performance culture: a focus on results, measurable targets, driven individuals, and identifying winners and losers. Results matter, but these environments often become controlling and high-pressure. People protect their reputations, avoid risk, and hold onto age-old beliefs about what works.

A culture of experimentation (or growth culture) still cares about results, but shifts the focus to the environment that produces them:

Building a culture focused on performance may not be the best, healthiest, or most sustainable way to fuel results. Instead, it may be more effective to focus on creating a culture of growth.

Tony Schwartz, Harvard Business Review

Culture also beats strategy. Peter Drucker famously remarked that “culture eats strategy for breakfast”, not to diminish the importance of strategy, but to shine a light on culture as a critical element of success. Your growth marketing strategy is likely to fail, or at best be far less effective, without the right culture to support it.

Why experimentation culture matters

The case for experimentation is straightforward: most marketing ideas do not work. Research from Ronny Kohavi, former VP of experimentation at Microsoft, found that only about one-third of experiments at companies like Microsoft, Amazon, and Booking.com produce positive results. Another third show no significant difference, and the final third actually make things worse.

Without experimentation, your team is likely spending two-thirds of its effort on things that either do not help or actively hurt results. A culture of experimentation helps you find the one-third that works, and stop wasting resources on the rest.

Companies that embed experimentation into their culture also tend to:

How to build a culture of experimentation

1. Leadership has to go first

Experimentation culture starts at the top. If leadership rewards only successful outcomes and punishes failure, the team will avoid risk. If leadership celebrates the process of testing and learning, regardless of individual results, the team will experiment more.

Steven Bartlett, founder of Social Chain, makes this point directly:

Your team either behave in that way or they don’t, and that’s usually, honestly, down to the leadership. Whether the leadership are risk-taking, whether they’re fast moving, whether they trust their team members, whether they empower people, whether they’re punishing people for doing the wrong things. All of these things matter.

Steven Bartlett, founder of Social Chain

Leaders need to model the behaviour they want to see. Share your own failed experiments openly. Ask “what did we learn?” instead of “why didn’t it work?” Make it clear that not experimenting is riskier than running a test that fails.

2. Make experimentation a habit, not an event

The best experimentation cultures treat testing as a continuous process, not a quarterly initiative. Build experimentation into the team’s regular workflow.

Practical steps:

Even in our team now, every Monday, even my social team, they report up to me a list of experiments that they did in the last 7 days.

Steven Bartlett, founder of Social Chain

3. Reward the process, not just the outcomes

This is the hardest cultural shift. Most organisations reward success and punish failure. In an experimentation culture, you reward the act of experimenting (the hypothesis, the test design, the rigour of measurement) regardless of whether the experiment “won.”

Practical approaches:

4. Lower the cost of running experiments

The easier it is to run an experiment, the more experiments your team will run. Remove friction wherever you can:

5. Build a system for capturing and sharing learnings

Without a system for capturing what you have learned, each experiment exists in isolation and the team keeps re-learning the same lessons.

Common mistakes

Treating experimentation as optional. If experiments only happen when there is “spare time,” they will never happen consistently. Experimentation needs dedicated time and resources, like any other core marketing activity.

Optimising too early. Teams often jump straight to optimising existing channels (A/B testing button colours) before testing bigger strategic bets. Balance quick-win optimisation with higher-risk, higher-reward experiments.

Confusing activity with experimentation. Launching a new campaign is not an experiment unless you have a hypothesis, a control, and a way to measure the result. Be rigorous about what counts as an experiment.

Giving up after early failures. The first few experiments often fail. This is normal: remember, two-thirds of experiments at the best companies do not produce positive results. The value comes from the cumulative learning, not any single test.

Measuring experimentation culture

Track these metrics to gauge whether your experimentation culture is working:

Booking.com, one of the most cited examples of experimentation culture, runs over 25,000 experiments per year. You do not need to match that number, but the principle holds: the more you experiment, the faster you learn and grow.

Experiment patiently, accept failures, plant seeds, protect saplings, and double down when you see customer delight.

Jeff Bezos, Amazon, 2016 Letter to Shareholders

Getting started

You do not need to transform your culture overnight. Start with one change: commit to running one experiment per week for the next month. Track the results. Share the learnings. Build from there.

Growth Method is the work management platform built for growth teams, combining ideation, experimentation, and analytics in one place. Book a call to learn more.


Back to top ↑