ICE Framework: The original prioritisation framework for marketers
Request a demo
Project management for growth and agile marketing professionals. Map your acquisition funnel, integrate analytics and run agile experiments.
Recent experiments results include competitor SEO, AI-driven content, exit-intent modals and AB testing homepage headlines.
We are on-track to deliver a 43% increase in inbound leads this year. There is no doubt the adoption of Growth Method is the primary driver behind these results.
Global Director of Brand & Digital, Colt
We are vetted mentors with Growth Mentor and a partner with the Agile Marketing Alliance.
Introducing the ICE framework
The ICE framework is the original scoring mechanism for growth marketing teams. It is widely considered to have been invented by Sean Ellis, considered by many to be one of the leaders in the growth hacking movement and now the CEO of GrowthHackers.com.
As a result, the ICE framework is probably the dominant scoring framework used by growth teams today.
What is a prioritisation framework?
A prioritisation framework, or growth strategy framework, is used by product teams, growth teams and marketing teams to prioritise work and to assist with decision making.
Using these frameworks ideas from marketing teams, product teams, stakeholders, partners and consultants are assigned a quantitative score to determine the order in which work should be done.
There are a number of prioritisation frameworks, or scoring frameworks, all centred around the same theme. These include:
- RICE Score
- ICE framework
What does ICE stand for?
ICE is an acronym for 3 factors that make up an ICE score, these are:
- I – Impact
- C- Confidence
- E – Effort
|Impact||How impactful do I expect this test to be? Consider any relevant metrics and past data to calculate the likely impact on your baseline metric.|
|Confidence||How sure am I that this test will prove my hypothesis? Use data and past experience to assign a confidence score.|
|Ease||How easily can I get launch this test? As a marketer, if an idea needs no development work and you can complete it on your own, give it a higher score.|
How do you calculate an ICE score?
Firstly, a score of between 1 and 10 is assigned to each individual factor (Impact, Confidence and Ease) and then all 3 scores are multiplied together to provide an overall score of between 3 and 30.
The biggest advantage of the ICE framework is its simplicity, decisions can be made very quickly, particularly where ‘good enough’ is the goal. That said, the main criticism is the subjectivity within the scoring, particularly for newer growth teams where there may be little or no historic data with which to accurately determine potential impact or confidence in an idea.
ICE framework template
The image below shows a set of ideas scored based on Impact, Confidence and Ease. The ideas with the highest score rise to the top of the list (or backlog) thereby creating a prioritised to-do list for the growth team.
Why use the ICE framework?
As with any prioritisation framework, the scores themselves are largely meaningless. The goal of using ICE is to:
- Assess the idea in a thoughtful, structured and unbiased way
- Provide the ability to easily compare the ideas against others
Other articles you might like
Here are some related articles and further reading you may find helpful.
- The PXL framework: a prioritisation framework for growth marketers
- The PIE framework: a prioritisation framework for growth marketers
- ICE Framework: The original prioritisation framework for marketers
- The RICE framework: a prioritisation for growth marketing
- How to pick a prioritisation framework – RICE, ICE, PIE or HIPE?